Website_Capabilities_070-White-Collar-and-Corporate Crime

At the intersection of litigation and international trade

With expedited timelines and powerful, decisive remedies, the ITC is an important forum for high-stakes, global disputes, and we’re at the forefront. Our team’s 93% Initial Determination win rate since 2002 is unrivaled by any other firm. We help clients succeed with our technically-savvy, business-minded approach to ITC litigation.

Cases move quickly at the ITC – discovery is fast, deadlines are short, and initial rulings can happen within 12 months of filing a complaint. We leverage our experience handling 80+ Section 337 patent cases since 2000 to stay one step ahead of the unique rules, procedures, and requirements of the ITC and to avoid surprises. And because we delivered favorable outcomes to clients in 27 of the last 29 initial determinations we were involved in, we know how succeed in this dynamic forum.

Our team has its finger on the pulse when it comes to the most sophisticated and complex technologies – bridging the gap between technical knowledge and legal strategy. We speak the language and craft legal strategies informed by both legal knowhow and technological nuance.

“The results speak for themselves in terms of value for money - if you want to win, DLA Piper is a good team to hire.”

Client Testimonial, Chambers USA 2024

When parallel proceedings threaten to divert critical resources, our deep bench of ITC litigators also includes leading trademark, trade secret, and antitrust and competition lawyers to navigate any issue and deliver a fully coordinated and effective strategy. Our practice includes lawyers who previously worked at the ITC on Section 337 matters in the most influential offices at the agency, including the Office of Administrative Law Judges, the Office of Unfair Imports Investigations (i.e., ITC Staff), and the Office of the General Counsel. This experience involved trying cases before the ITC’s Administrative Law Judges (ALJs), advising the ALJs on how to decide their cases, advising the Commissioner on how to craft its final determination, and briefing and arguing Federal Circuit appeals from ITC final determinations. Our lawyers leverage this experience in every case to develop creative strategies to help our clients with the most challenging matters.

Legal, administrative, and political nuances all play a role in ITC investigations. Our integrated team features leading IP litigators working side-by-side with government affairs advisors to deliver solutions to tackle ITC investigations from all angles.

Awards and recognition

Experience

  • Certain Electronic Devices and Semiconductor Devices Having Wireless Communication Capabilities and Components Thereof (represented NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA Inc. in ITC Investigation No.1367; Result: Win)
  • Certain Semiconductors and Devices and Products Containing the Same, Including Printed Circuit Boards, Automotive Parts, and Automobiles (represented NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA Inc. in ITC Investigation No. 1332; Result: Win)
  • Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices and Components Thereof (represented Lenovo, Motorola, LG, Dell, and Samsung in ITC Investigation No. 1280; Result: Win)
  • Certain IP Camera Systems Including Video Doorbells and Components Thereof (represented Arlo Technologies in ITC Investigation No. 1242; Result: Win)
  • Certain High-Potency Sweeteners and Products Containing Same (represented Celanese Corporation in ITC Investigation No. 1264; Result: Loss)
  • Certain Digital Video-Capable Devices and Components Thereof (represented Lenovo Group Ltd. and Lenovo (US) Inc. in ITC Investigation No. 1224; Result: Win
  • Certain Botulinum Toxin Products and Products Containing Same (represented Allergan (Abbvie) in ITC Investigation No. 1145; Result: Win)
  • Certain Carburetors and Products Containing Carburetors (represented Techtronic Industries and The Home Depot in ITC Investigation No. 1123; Result: Win)
  • Certain Infotainment Systems and Automobiles Containing Same (represented Toyota, Panasonic, DENSO, and Japan Radio in ITC Investigation No. 1119; Result: Win)
  • In the Matter of Certain Thermoplastic-Encapsulated Electric Motors, Components Thereof (represented BMW AG and BMW North America, LLC in ITC Investigation No. 1052; Result: Win)
  • Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (represented Toshiba Corporation in ITC Investigation No. 1046; Result: Win)
  • Certain Silicon Tuners And Products Containing Same (represented Silicon Labs in ITC Investigation No. 917; Result: Win)
  • Certain Television Sets, Television Receivers, Television Tuners (represented Silicon Labs and Samsung Electronics in ITC Investigation No. 910; Result: Win)
  • Certain Optical Disc Drives And Products Containing The Same (represented Toshiba Corporation in ITC Investigation No. 897; Result: Win)
  • Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices (represented Samsung Electronics in ITC Investigation No. 853; Result: Win)
  • Certain Integrated Circuits, Chipsets, and Products Containing Same (represented Zoran Corp. in ITC Investigation No. 786; Result: Win)
  • Certain Static Random Access Memories and Prod’s Containing Same (represented GSI Technology in ITC Investigation No. 792; Result: Win)
  • Certain Automated Media Library Devices (represented Overland Storage in ITC Investigation No. 746; Result: Loss)
  • Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and Components (represented Ricoh Company in ITC Investigation No. 690; Result: Win)
  • Certain NAND Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (represented Toshiba Corporation in ITC Investigation No. 553; Result: Win)
  • Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips II (represented Zoran Corp. and Oak Technology in ITC Investigation No. 523; Result: Win)
  • Certain Personal Computers, Monitors, and Components (represented Hewlett-Packard Company in ITC Investigation No. 519; Result: Win)
  • Certain Personal Computers, Server Computers, and Components (represented Hewlett-Packard Company in ITC Investigation No. 509; Result: Win)
  • Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips (represented Zoran Corp. and Oak Technology in ITC Investigation No. 506; Result: Win)
  • Certain Audio Digital-to-Analog Converters and Products (represented Cirrus Logic in ITC Investigation No. 499; Result: Win)
  • Certain Power Amplifier Chips, Broadband Tuner Chips, Transceiver Chips (represented Microtune in ITC Investigation No. 490; Result: Win)
  • Certain Ink Jet Print Cartridges and Components Thereof (represented Hewlett-Packard Company in ITC Investigation No. 446; Result: Win)

Contact